While the Internet has revolutionized information delivery for most of
us, for many communities in the developing world it remains an
economic and technological challenge to access online resources. High
charges for telephone and ISP access can quickly grow unaffordable,
and low-bandwidth connections limit the amount of material that can be
viewed per session. Because phone lines are limited (e.g., a single
phone in a school) it is often difficult to time-share between
Internet and voice. Furthermore, unreliable network and power
infrastructures can sometimes block Internet access altogether.
The motivation behind TEK is that, in many areas, the cost of email
access is significantly lower than full-fledged Internet access.
Email is cheaper because it can be downloaded directly from a local
Internet Service Provider (ISP), rather than requiring an interactive
session over saturated international links. As illustrated in the
following table, email can offer between a 2X and 35X cost savings in
many low-bandwidth areas. Furthermore, this differential is critical
for enabling affordable access, as the monthly cost of Internet alone
is up to 2X higher than the monthly household wage.
Country
ISP
Cost of Internet (Percentage
of Household Income)
Cost of Internet ($US)
Cost of Email ($US)
Cost of Internet /
Cost of Email
Malawi
MalawiNet
155%
28.30
0.80
35.4
Kenya
Kenyaweb.com
79%
40.30
5.46
7.4
Nepal
WorldLink
24%
8.41
1.20
7.0
Vietnam
NetNam
29%
20.02
3.15
6.4
Nigeria
MetroNG E Services
226%
91.44
17.11
5.3
Argentina
Cablenet / Intercom
2%
8.85
2.02
4.4
Albania
Adanet
7%
19.00
5.00
3.8
Australia
average
1%
19.44
5.30
3.7
Sri Lanka
LankaNet
17%
23.50
7.50
3.1
Zimbabwe
Zimbabwe online
7%
4.93
1.64
3.0
Ecuador
ecuanet
14%
29.00
10.00
2.9
South Africa
average
5%
13.10
4.72
2.8
Papau New Guinnea
Daltron
44%
25.00
9.16
2.7
Romania
EcoSoft
5%
18.00
8.50
2.1
Mexico
Net Solutions
12%
81.00
50.00
1.6
Saudi Arabia
average
<1%
12.00
8.00
1.5
Notes: Data from ISP Websites (July 2005), UNDP Development
Report 2004, and WorldBank 2003. Monthly Internet access was
calculated as 30 hours online or the unlimited rate (whichever was
cheaper). Monthly household income was derived from GNP per capita,
ignoring the richest 20% of the population and using a household size
of 2.5. Rates for Australia were averaged over the following ISPs:
AceNet, Ask Aussie, Australia Internet Solutions, and Arachnet. Rates
for South Africa were averaged over Artslink and Sybaweb ISPs. Rates
for Saudi Arabia were averaged over Atheer and Zajil Retail Services
ISPs.
The data from the table above is available as an Excel spreadsheet and is presented
graphically in this presentation.
Delivering Web content over email is even more important for some
locations, where there is no interactive connectivity whatsoever. For
example, the People's First
Network in the Solomon Islands provides store-and-forward
connectivity over an HF radio network. While no direct Internet
access is available, villagers use TEK to retrieve Web content.
Similarly, First Mile
Solutions provides store-and-forward connectivity to communities
in Cambodia, Rwanda, Costa Rica, and India, and relies on TEK for all
Internet content.
There are also additional benefits of using email to transfer
information. By avoiding interactive online sessions, queries can be
sent and received at night when phone lines and Internet rates are
significantly cheaper (up to 9X cheaper in Pakistan, see spreadsheet
above). Downloading results via email also shortens the connection
time, thereby decreasing phone costs. Furthermore, viewing search
results offline provides a quick and reliable user interface, and
establishes a local database of shared information.